<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Forrester tells ad agencies to change or die</title>
	<atom:link href="http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/</link>
	<description>Rants and musings on technology, AR and social media</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 02:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Forrester report: redefining high-value customers &#171; Technobabble 2.0</title>
		<link>http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3447</link>
		<dc:creator>Forrester report: redefining high-value customers &#171; Technobabble 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 14:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3447</guid>
		<description>[...] themselves to take advantage of their own customer evangelists. The quote below seems to back-up Forrester&#8217;s earlier findings that looked at how agencies need to evolve: In 2012, US marketers will spend more in social media [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] themselves to take advantage of their own customer evangelists. The quote below seems to back-up Forrester&#8217;s earlier findings that looked at how agencies need to evolve: In 2012, US marketers will spend more in social media [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outside Line &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talking with, not talking at</title>
		<link>http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3335</link>
		<dc:creator>Outside Line &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Talking with, not talking at</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:40:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3335</guid>
		<description>[...] at Technobabble 2.0, Jonny sums up some of the best blog reaction to the report, as well as some of his own observations. I particularly liked this one, as [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] at Technobabble 2.0, Jonny sums up some of the best blog reaction to the report, as well as some of his own observations. I particularly liked this one, as [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Goodman</title>
		<link>http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3325</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3325</guid>
		<description>Jonny
Thanks for commenting back – I think you summed it up very nicely with “as technology evolves so does the medium by which messages are transmitted”.

Some traditional avenues are certainly going wayside Traditional Business and phone directories, regional newspapers.

I think many of us still like the feel our niche magazines which can conveniently go where technology is best left alone. And TV has its own evolution but we’ll always have a place for living room entertainment. 

I like to think of the current state of affairs as an Expansion of possibilities rather than a Coup d'état. But I can certainly see the need to be on top of it – as new technology, media democratization, and social venues in technology (level the playing field) and make it possible for anyone to shine or else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jonny<br />
Thanks for commenting back – I think you summed it up very nicely with “as technology evolves so does the medium by which messages are transmitted”.</p>
<p>Some traditional avenues are certainly going wayside Traditional Business and phone directories, regional newspapers.</p>
<p>I think many of us still like the feel our niche magazines which can conveniently go where technology is best left alone. And TV has its own evolution but we’ll always have a place for living room entertainment. </p>
<p>I like to think of the current state of affairs as an Expansion of possibilities rather than a Coup d&#8217;état. But I can certainly see the need to be on top of it – as new technology, media democratization, and social venues in technology (level the playing field) and make it possible for anyone to shine or else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3317</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:41:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3317</guid>
		<description>Kevin, you raise some very good points. I think that the hub of what Forrester is getting at is that messages directed at individuals through ones peers are far more likely to resonate with them compared to a mass-ad approach. This isn't to say that advertising can't be creative but rather other marketing tactics are beginning to become more cost effective. There will always be a place for best-of-breed solutions but as technology evolves so does the medium by which messages are transmitted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin, you raise some very good points. I think that the hub of what Forrester is getting at is that messages directed at individuals through ones peers are far more likely to resonate with them compared to a mass-ad approach. This isn&#8217;t to say that advertising can&#8217;t be creative but rather other marketing tactics are beginning to become more cost effective. There will always be a place for best-of-breed solutions but as technology evolves so does the medium by which messages are transmitted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Goodman</title>
		<link>http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3310</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Goodman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3310</guid>
		<description>I’ve struggled to make sense of this article (not your blog post).  For one I am having trouble understanding if we are talking about agency structure, advertising in its self as a traditional medium via traditional media versus social technology, or the marketing message. 

Either way it is a little absurd to suggest advertising in the sense of commercials and print ads is failing. For one, good traditional advertising lends brand credibility. Furthermore Ads that connect with their market segment are very effective. I think a good ad can make all the difference. And yes, we are becoming desensitized to marketing messages – but that’s the talent of it. The trick is knowing, engaging, and capturing your audience. Take some of the recent Hardees commercials or the Toyota tundra commercials – glorifying the common Joe. Flattery works and so does advertising. Let’s not forget Buzz-marketing and Advertising are separate tactics within the larger sphere of marketing communications.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’ve struggled to make sense of this article (not your blog post).  For one I am having trouble understanding if we are talking about agency structure, advertising in its self as a traditional medium via traditional media versus social technology, or the marketing message. </p>
<p>Either way it is a little absurd to suggest advertising in the sense of commercials and print ads is failing. For one, good traditional advertising lends brand credibility. Furthermore Ads that connect with their market segment are very effective. I think a good ad can make all the difference. And yes, we are becoming desensitized to marketing messages – but that’s the talent of it. The trick is knowing, engaging, and capturing your audience. Take some of the recent Hardees commercials or the Toyota tundra commercials – glorifying the common Joe. Flattery works and so does advertising. Let’s not forget Buzz-marketing and Advertising are separate tactics within the larger sphere of marketing communications.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kim</title>
		<link>http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3304</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:48:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3304</guid>
		<description>Hello Jonny - thanks for sharing your thoughts and starting to show how the discussion is being woven together.  To Ludovic's question - I write my research for a client-side role; the Connected Agency was written for marketing leadership professionals.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Jonny - thanks for sharing your thoughts and starting to show how the discussion is being woven together.  To Ludovic&#8217;s question - I write my research for a client-side role; the Connected Agency was written for marketing leadership professionals.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonny</title>
		<link>http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3303</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3303</guid>
		<description>I guess knowing what to do and doing it yourself are two different things. The latter certainly requires far more resources - however, within the area of peer/evolving influence I do believe that Forrester is in a leadership position and have hired well. Now if only they will match this for their other areas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess knowing what to do and doing it yourself are two different things. The latter certainly requires far more resources - however, within the area of peer/evolving influence I do believe that Forrester is in a leadership position and have hired well. Now if only they will match this for their other areas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ludovic</title>
		<link>http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3302</link>
		<dc:creator>Ludovic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 09:18:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://technobabble2dot0.wordpress.com/2008/02/13/forrester-tells-ad-agencies-to-change-or-die/#comment-3302</guid>
		<description>OK, I do say this because I have a vested interest on the question BUT I would beg the question of "why is Forrester having an opinion on advertising" when they struggle to deliver IT Analysis insights for vertical industries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I do say this because I have a vested interest on the question BUT I would beg the question of &#8220;why is Forrester having an opinion on advertising&#8221; when they struggle to deliver IT Analysis insights for vertical industries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
